tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5013339306349204192.post7292194050418578080..comments2023-11-05T22:39:34.996+10:30Comments on Classic Theology New: In Search of a Human JesusWarren Huffahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06641632471131333680noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5013339306349204192.post-78509032678937357072008-06-06T16:30:00.000+09:302008-06-06T16:30:00.000+09:30Then that's OK!Then that's OK!Stephan Clarkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11194782441138561354noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5013339306349204192.post-69648143277587409682008-06-06T15:10:00.000+09:302008-06-06T15:10:00.000+09:30I mean that his divinity is not alongside his huma...I mean that his divinity is not alongside his humanity. So I am disagreeing with those who try to divide Jesus up, either in his being or in his ministry. In the transfiguration, for example, it is not his divinity over against his humanity that is seen, but it is deified humanity. In Jesus of Nazareth the disciples were encountering the fullest expression of divinity that humanity could carry, Warren Huffahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06641632471131333680noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5013339306349204192.post-55984500509745419482008-06-06T12:15:00.000+09:302008-06-06T12:15:00.000+09:30his divinity is discerned invisibly in his human a...<I>his divinity is discerned invisibly in his human acts</I><BR/>If the human acts (eg being incarnate, and healing and miracles, and indeed being resurrected) are visible then why do you say that Christ's divinity is invisible.<BR/>I don't think you can just suggest that the 'divinity' is invisible but its consequences are visible. That would be to deny the incarnational principle, wouldn't it?Stephan Clarkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11194782441138561354noreply@blogger.com