Strangely, Jesus is mostly absent from today’s story. Jesus speaks in verses 1-7 and 35-41. He is present in the remaining verses that constitute the bulk of the story, but not in person. But he is there, the subject of the action. And if I were to summarise verses 8-34 it would be something like:
1. People wondered about the man and his healing. Is it really him? The man confirms the miracle at the hands of Jesus. (9:8-12)
2. The Pharisees speak to the man and are divided in their opinion about Jesus. Jesus broke the sabbath; he is therefore a sinner. But others wondered how a sinner could perform such a miracle. They ask the man, and he confesses Jesus as a prophet. (9:13-17)
3. The man’s parents are called to verify the facts. But his parents, fearful of the consequences, direct them back to the man. (9:18-23)
4. The man is interrogated again. He says he doesn’t know if Jesus is a sinner, but one thing he does know: “I was blind, now I see.” Jesus must be from God. They revile the man as a disciple of Jesus and refuse to be taught by such a man.
From 9:35, Jesus returns to the narrative and leads the man to articulate his faith in Jesus: “Lord, I believe.” And he worships Jesus. (Compare John 20:28) Jesus finds the man and brings him to faith. Jesus then teaches what has just played out between the man and the opponents of Jesus in respect of jesus. Jesus coming into the world brings judgement. (See John 3:17-21) His presence allows those who come to faith to shift from spiritual blindness to spiritual (in)sight, but those who physically see but reject Jesus because they claim they have spiritual (in)sight, become blind. (9:39-41) The man who was physically and spiritually blind moves from blindness to physical sight and spiritual (in)sight, culminating in his confession of Jesus as the Son of Man. On the other hand, the opponents of Jesus, while physically able to see, remain in spiritual darkness. They refuse to acknowledge the sign of the miracle and what it means (about Jesus). And they refuse to be taught by the man who has gained both physical and spiritual sight. And this double movement applies to the man as he moves from sin to faith, and the opponents from a claimed righteousness to the darkness of clinging sin. (9:40-41)
The absence of Jesus through the middle of the narrative allows us to watch a man arguing himself into faith. And he is wrestling not just with others, but also with himself, and with God. (See Genesis 32:22-32) He argues with his neighbours and names Jesus as the miracle worker. He argues for Jesus against the Pharisees: “Jesus healed me and he is a prophet.” And again, with more opponents of Jesus, the man implies that he is, or wishes to be, a disciple of Jesus. (9:27) And he is reviled by them. But the man knows that sinners can’t do what Jesus has done. And the miracle is a sign waiting to be interpreted correctly. (In John 5, Jesus heals on the sabbath. In the dispute with his opponents, he says that he gives life on the sabbath just as his Father is working on the sabbath. See John 5:16-18 & 10:10) The man is coming to faith: “If this man were not from God, he could do nothing.” (9:33)
And then Jesus meets the man, points to the man’s hope, and declares that he, Jesus, is the fulfilment of that hope. (9:37)
“Lord, I believe.” And he worshipped him. (9:38) I, too, have argued myself into a deeper faith at times. I do it every time I write a sermon. I wrestle with the text. In speaking to others about Jesus, I argue myself into a deeper faith. The interaction with others, with life itself in all its joy and sorrow, asks me to decide. Is life stronger than sin and death? Without God, does any of it make sense? Is Jesus the one?
“Yes, Lord, I believe.” And he worshipped him.
