Thursday 30 October 2008

All Souls Day



Where do we go when we die? 'Heaven', or 'Up there', to live with God. [True enough, as long as we remember God doesn't occupy space literally. God transcends time and space. Better to think of God as somehow else rather than somewhere else.] Another answer might be wherever Jesus is. And we are on a better track now I suspect. Perhaps an even better answer is to reframe the question from where we go to with whom we will be with. And the answer to that question is 'Jesus'. Our salvation - heaven if you like - is entirely through Jesus. This is the most basic point of the Christian gospel: Jesus and the Spirit allow us to enjoy the same relationship with God that Jesus enjoys. Where God is, that's where Jesus is, and that is where we will be. Or if you prefer a less spatial metaphor, the relationship that Jesus enjoys with the Father, we too will enjoy through and in Jesus. Faith unites us with him, so that we enjoy the relationship of love that we name Father-Son/child in the Trinity.

But the answer to the question 'with whom will we be with' is not only Jesus. We believe in the communion of saints, which is not just talking about 'saints' as the particularly holy, but the communion of all those who have been made holy in Christ through the Spirit. Salvation is not to be conceived principally about us individually enjoying God, but as a communion of all the blessed in and through Christ, together with Christ, enjoying Christ's relationship with God.

Wednesday 29 October 2008

Moving From Pessimism to Optimism


One thing about being a priest is that no matter how bad things seem in my life, I am always meeting people whose lives seem worse. That's one of the problems with suffering (and one of the differences between me and Jesus); suffering usually makes us self-focused. So when we are feeling bad about life, remember, it can always get worse.

A Maharaja went out to sea when a great storm arose. One of the slaves on board began to cry out and wail in fear, for the man had never been on a ship before. His crying was so loud and so prolonged that everyone on board began to be annoyed and the Maharaja was for throwing the man overboard. But his Chief Adviser who was a sage said. “No let me deal with this man. I think I can cure him”. With that he ordered some of the sailors to hurl the man in the sea .The moment he found himself in the sea the poor slave began to scream in terror and to thrash out wildly. In a few seconds the sage ordered him to be hauled on board. Back on board the slave lay in a corner in absolute silence . When the Maharaja asked his advisor for the reason he replied, ”We never realize how lucky we are until our situation gets worse”. (Anthony de Mello, Prayer of the Frog vol 2, p. 212.)

So things can always be worse! And in addition, remember what Jesus said: the sun will shine tomorrow. Hey, it will be a new day, with new opportunities, and new gifts to see and enjoy if we open our eyes. The sun will shine. And if things still seem bad, remember, very rarely do things turn out as bad as they seem they might. Very rarely. About the only one I know is death, because that is pretty definitive. (But even that can't swallow up all the goodness of God.)

The three keys to moving from pessimism to optimism:
things could be a lot worse
the sun will shine tomorrow (and there are lots of good things in life)
and things rarely turn out as bad as you think they will

Tuesday 28 October 2008

God Whose I Am


And yet, when all is said and done, advance which comes as continuous progress is an expansion of the circle of which self is still the centre. It may theoretically be so expanded as to include all mankind, even all spiritual beings. But self is still the centre, and if God Himself be included in the circle, He is peripheral, not central; He is, for me, my God, not God whose I am. (William Temple)

Monday 27 October 2008

Help Us To Change

God, help us to change. To change ourselves and to change our world. To know the need for it. To deal with the pain of it. To feel the joy of it. To undertake the journey without understanding the destination. The art of gentle revolution. Amen. (Michael Leunig)

Sunday 26 October 2008

The Day the World Cried


[Today we enjoyed our Sunday Eucharist at the beach, complete with sand altar decorated by the children. The readings were Psalm 98:4-10 and John 2:1-11.]

We have a very cute little dog with a pushed in face. We also had her mother as a pet, and her name was Piggy because of the noise she made while eating. The day she died it rained. I said the world was crying at her death. A funny way of looking at things perhaps, but one not that far off Scripture. We often divorce spiritual and material to the point of paganism. But Psalm 98 reminds us that creation praises God in its own way. And the Gospel we read has the water cooperating with the wine in adding to the joy of the marriage, but more importantly allowing the saviour to be manifested to his disciples (Jn 2:11). We often think of the miracles of Jesus as him overpowering or taming nature, or manipulating inert, dead, material. But the alternative view of all of creation responding to the saviour makes just as much theological sense, if not more. The spiritual and material in the Christian scheme of things are not dualistically divorced. God made all that is, and if God ever stopped creating, everything that is would immediately cease to exist. Creation is continually in the presence of God, and might not be as 'unaware' of it as we think. The classic example of this is the darkness at the crucifixion of Jesus. We often think of this as God making the light fade to make a point. But what if it were the world mourning the loss of the saviour?

All this fits with a proper understanding of the Incarnation, sacraments and the bodily resurrection of Jesus. If God became human, and was bodily resurrected, and if we can receive God by eating and drinking, and doing this together, then it makes sense that the world mourned the death of the saviour that dark afternoon.

Friday 24 October 2008

The Two Best Ways To Live (Kids' Talk)


Following on from the ten commandments as great ways to live, we have now the 2 greatest ways to live.

Remember when we talked about the 10 great ways to live? Can anyone remember any of them?

Hard isn't it? There are so many. But Jesus taught us a way to remember the ten. He noticed that the first four are about God, and the last 6 are about other people. So he made the 10 great ways to live into 2 greatest ways to live: Love God with everything you are, and love yur neighbour as yourself.

[If you want to impress everyone you can use this distinction between the first 4 and the last 6 as a mnemonic device to remember the 10 pretty easily.]

Thursday 23 October 2008

A Prayer to Accept the Wonder and Mystery of Faith

When your Son lived on earth he gathered the children into his arms and rejoiced in the simplicity of their faith. Give us such faith, that we who are bowed down by doubts and fears may know, deep in our hearts, the truth of your love, and with the children be ready to accept the wonder and mystery of faith without seeking always to understand. Amen.

Wednesday 22 October 2008

A Practical Benefit of Forgiveness


A former inmate of a Nazi concentration camp was visiting a friend who had shared the ordeal with him.

"Have you forgiven the Nazis?" he asked his friend.

"Yes."

"Well, I haven't. I'm still consumed with hatred for them."

"In that case," said his friend gently, "they still have you in prison." (From Anthony de Mello)

I remember reading of a Mengele twin who said that if she met Mengele she would forgive him. Why? Because otherwise she let's him control her life. She forgives for herself, and is an extraordinary freedom - the freedom to forgive when the trespass is unforgivable.

Tuesday 21 October 2008

Choosing Involves Renunciation


Many of us find it difficult to make choices. This is not because we cannot find anything that suits our preference, but precisely for the opposite reason, namely, we find it difficult to exclude the things which will not be involved in our choice. Scholastic philosophers had the dictum: ‘Every choice is also a renunciation.’ This is very true since whenever we choose one thing, we necessarily exclude certain other things.

For this reason we find it hard to choose a vocation, an occupation, a set of friends, a life companion or even a new house or car. The difficulty arises because, in choosing, we have to limit ourselves, and our lonely, insatiable insides rebel against this. Thus we often end up dissipating our creative and affective energies: hanging loose, spreading ourselves too thin, unable to make clear choices and commitments, procrastinating indefinitely, being wishy-washy and generally being unable to make decisions which could give our lives more direction and thus help us to love and work more effectively.(Ronald Rolheiser)

Argument For the Existence of God

The Bible has no arguments for the existence of God. There are moments of conflict with God, anger with God, doubt about God's purposes, anguish and lostness when people have no real sense of God's presence... Don't imagine that the Bible is full of comfortable and reassuring things about the life of belief and trust; it isn't. It is often about the appalling cost of letting God come near you and of trying to trust him when all the evidence seems to have gone. But Abraham, Moses and St Paul don't sit down to work out whether God exists; they are already caught up in something the imperative reality of which they can't deny or ignore. At one level, you have to see that the very angst and struggle they bring to their relation with God is itself a kind of argument for God: if they take God that seriously, at least this isn't some cosy made-up way of making yourself feel better. (Rowan Williams)

Monday 20 October 2008

Crux

by Peter Steele

Seeing you go
Where the dead are bound, and having no resource
To twist those timbers out of their lethal course,
I want at least to know

What I can say
Now that the boasts have blown away and even
The cursing has grown faint, while the pall of heaven
Abolishes the day.

I was never wise
In word or silence, never understood
The killer in my members, thought of good
At what one might devise

From scraps of evil.
How can I learn a way for me or mine
To stand beside you? Vinegar, not wine,
Is all we give you still.

Among the dice
And the dirt, with more of shame than love to show,
All that will come to heart is 'Do not go
Alone to Paradise.'

Friday 17 October 2008

The Free and Unmerited Initiative of God

It is significant that the origins of God's call of Israel are remembered no further back than the call to Abraham and Sarah. God initiates the call to Israel, and this free choice and initiative of God is always the practical, historical expression of what we call, generally, grace. God chooses, God initiates, and the relationship with God never begins with a movement from the side of creation. It is because God initiates that God is free to be surprising and novel in the relationship with creation, and God's response is never determined by human action (particularly failure). Later Israel's election was set in the broader context of the implied covenant of creation and the covenant made to Noah and all creatures. This is why the covenant through Noah precedes the covenant with Abraham. However, it is interesting to note that Israel never took its election to be a specific example of this wider covenant between God and creation. There is evidence in the Scriptures that Israel did understand her election in a broad and universal context, but as the fulfillment of the general, not a particular example of a more universal covenant. Israel's covenant was particular in itself and unique, related to the covenant with Noah, but not just an expression of it. See Hans Urs von Balthasar, Engagement with God, pp. 13-14.

Thursday 16 October 2008

2009 Blog Conference Posts


The Inaugural Adelaide Anglican Blog Conference is taking shape. The titles of the seven posts that will be published over the course of the conference are as follows:


'Inspiration, Inerrancy and Biblical Authority: Some Thoughts for those Navigating Treacherous Waters' (Right Revd Dr Stephen Pickard)


The Wisdom of Ants and the Storehouses of Snow: Fresh Readings of the Bible For a Planet in Peril. (Dr Lucy Larkin)


Prisoners of Belief: On Epistemic Privilege and Episcopal Fiats (Revd Dr David Willsher)

Penned, Pinned, or Patronized - the Word of God and Human Presumption (Revd Barbara Messner)


The Bible: The Living Word or a Golden Calf (The Very Revd Dr Steven Ogden)


Just How Plain is the "Plain Sense" of Scripture? (Revd Dr Phillip Tolliday)


A Seamless Garment: Reading Scripture as a Whole from the Whole. (Revd Dr Warren Huffa)


This promises to be an important contribution to the debate about Scripture in the Anglican Communion, emanating from little old Adelaide! And it all begins February 27, 2009.

Wednesday 15 October 2008

People From the Past Might Not Have Been As Stupid As We Sometimes Think!

This post from Faith and Theology makes some very important points about historical theology. Essentially, our task in reading theology from the past is not simply a matter of sifting out what is trans-historical and what is culturally bound. When we do that we assume that we can tell what is core and what is not. Instead, we must acknowledge the integrity of the text, and then realise that it was possible to write this theology (whatever it was) and be Christian. This way the writings of the past can challenge us (for instance, those silly bits that we sift out might be quite challenging when worked theologically), and we can no longer assume that we possess the only way of looking at things.

The author critiised in the post responded later to the accusations. He agrees with the points made by Ben Myers, but just doesn't think he made the errors as accused.